… would all the right-wingers turn into liberal "gun control" freaks?
Do they actually support the right of armed self-defense, or is it really all about THEIR supporters having the guns?
If abortion rights activists carried when they marched to defend clinics, would the conservatives be as supportive as they are of others who carry?
The "no fly" list is a travesty of justice, comp[letely opposed to the idea of trials and due process. Do you know how many people are on it because of similar sounding names, or because some politician decided they didn;t like them?
Even a Bush cousin was on it for awhile, and so were some of the Kennedys.
Of course THEY had the pull to get off of it — most people don’t.
.
Related posts:
3 responses so far ↓
1 dcarpenter72 //
I support gun rights except for felony criminals. We have background checks so guns don’t need to be regulated. Plus if they are on the no fly list they should automatically be on the list not to be able to buy guns.
2 cancun1313 //
Of course they would support the second amendment. it is for everyone not just the few. But I guess that’s not what you are trying to say is it? Get a grip
3 Joe //
That’s so sad.
Hysterical stereotyping and a misinterpretation of the 2nd amendment all in one.
Read the whole amendment.
The Supreme court recently ruled gun ownership was an "individual" right, that’s true, but the rest of that right to own or carry anywhere anytime is nonsense.
Carrying guns to protests is exactly the wrong thing to do. Responsible firearms owners concerned for their safety would not show the weapons as it fosters a shoot first or be shot reaction in the other camp.